We had such a great time speaking at Security Field Day recently, presenting the changes to our product since our last visit, and hearing from delegates about what issues concern them in microsegmentation technology.
The last time we were at Field Day was four years ago, and our product was in an entirely different place. The technology and vision have evolved since then. Of course, we’re still learning as we innovate, with the help of our customers who continually come up with new use cases and challenges to meet.
For those who missed our talk, here’s a look at some of what we discussed, and a brief recap of a few interesting and challenging questions that came up on the day.
Simplicity and Visibility First
At Guardicore, we know that ease of use is the foundation to widespread adoption of a new technology for any business. When we get into discussions with each enterprise, customer, or team, we see clearly that they have their own issues or road map to address. As there is no such thing as the ultimate or only use case for microsegmentation, we can start with the customer in mind. Our product can support any flavor, any need. Just as examples, some of the most popular use cases include separation of environments such as Dev/Prod, ring fencing critical assets, micro-segmenting digital crown jewels, compliance or least privilege and more general IT hygiene like vulnerable port protocols.
To make these use cases into reality, organizations need deep visibility to understand what’s going on in the data center from a human lens. It’s important to have flexible labeling so that you can physically see your data center with the same language that you use to speak about it. We also enhance this by allowing users to see a particular view based on their need or their role within the company. A compliance officer would have a different use for the map than the CTO, or a developer in DevSecOps for example. In addition, organizations need to enforce both blacklist and whitelist policy models for intuitive threat prevention and response. Our customers benefit from our cutting edge visibility tool, Reveal, which is completely customizable and checks all of these boxes. They also benefit from our flexible policy models that include both whitelisting and blacklisting.
To learn more about how our mapping and visibility happen, and how this helps to enforce policy with our uniquely flexible policy model as well and show quick value, watch our full presentation, below.
Addressing Questions and Challenges
With only one hour for presenting our product, there were a lot of questions that we couldn’t get to answer. Maybe next time! Here are three of the topics we wanted to address further.
Q. How does being agent-based affect your solution?
One of the questions raised during the session was surrounding the fact that Guardicore microsegmentation is an agent-based solution, as the benefits are clear, but people often want to know what the agent’s impact is on the workload.
The first thing we always tell customers who ask this question is that our solution is tried and tested. It is already deployed in some of the world’s biggest data centers such as Santander and Openlink, and works with a negligible impact on performance. Our agent footprint is very small, less than 0.1% CPU and takes up 185MB on Linux and 800MB on windows. Our resources are also configurable, allowing you to tailor the agent to what you need. At the same time, we support the largest amount of operating systems as compared to other vendors.
If the agent is still not suitable, you can use our L4 collectors, which sit at the hypervisor level or switch level, and give you full visibility, and use our virtual appliance for enforcement, as we touched upon during the talk. As experts in segmentation, we can talk you through your cybersecurity use cases, and discuss which approach works best, and where.
Q. Which breach detection capabilities are included?
Complementary controls are an important element of our solution, because they contribute to the ease of use and simplicity. One tool for multiple use cases offers a powerful competitive edge. Here are three of the tools we include:
- Reputation Analysis: We can identify granular threats, including suspicious domain names, IP addresses, and even file hashes in traffic flows.
- Dynamic Deception: The latest in incident response, this technique tricks attackers, diverting them to a honeypot environment where Labs can learn from their behavior.
- File Integrity Monitoring: A prerequisite for many compliance regulations, this change-detection mechanism will immediately alert to any unauthorized changes to files.
Q. How do you respond to a known threat?
Flexible policy models allow us to respond quickly and intuitively when it comes to breach detection and incident response. Some vendors have a whitelist only model, which impedes their ability to take immediate action and is not enough in a hybrid fast-paced data center. In contrast, we can immediately block a known threat or undesired ports by adding it to the blacklist. One example might be blocking Telnet across the whole environment, or blocking FTP at the process level. This helps us show real value from day one. Composite models can allow complex rules like the real-world example we used at the presentation, SSH is only allowed in Production environment if it comes from Jumpboxes. With Guardicore, this takes 2 simple rules, while with a whitelist model it would take thousands.
Until Next Time!
We loved presenting at Field Day, and want to thank all the delegates for their time and their interesting questions! If you want to talk more about any of the topics raised in the presentation, reach out to me via LinkedIn.
In the meantime, learn more about securing a hybrid modern data center which works across legacy infrastructure as well as containers and clouds.